Home | Hastings Center Report | The Hastings Center | Contact Us | Sign up for Bioethics Forum news and updates | RSS RSS

Bioethics Forum - Diverse Commentary on Issues in Bioethics

Home Articles By Author Articles By Date Articles By Subject
Media Notes

Monday, May 15, 2006
Nietzsche Wears an Earpiece
BY CARL ELLIOTT

Ah, if only sound bites really were like aphorisms, as Tod Chambers believes. Then every time we spent ten minutes on the phone with a reporter we would be following in the footsteps of Nietzsche and Wittgenstein. In fact, however, a sound bite is more like a miniature press release, and those of us who provide them are just doing our small part for the art of public relations.

Sound bites publicize a product, a person, or an idea, and their particular value comes from their simplicity. Sound bites cost very little, yet they carry considerable cultural authority. They carry this authority because journalists use them as expressions of expert judgment. Universities court quotable professors because they generate free publicity for the university; reporters like them because of the way their quotations decorate an article; and corporations pay them because of what they do for the company's bottom line.

Take, for example, the independent telecommunications analyst Jeff Kagan, who, according to his Web site, was quoted nearly 600 times in the media last year. An article in The Street says that Kagan became the "go-to guy" in telecom journalism because he has that "rare and beautiful quality that reporters treasure: He returns your call promptly, and he gives you a quotable comment you can drop in your story when you're minutes away from deadline." In fact, Kagan is so efficient a generator of quotations - The Street calls him "the quote-a-matic of telecom reporting" - that he can actually make a living at it.

Kagan is a "fee-based analyst," according to his Web site. This means that "he gives interviews, analysis and insights to the media for free, and charges everyone else." According to an article in The New York Post, a typical arrangement is for a company to pay Kagan $10,000 a month for his services. (Can you make that kind of money writing aphorisms? I don't think so.) Reporters rarely ask Kagan about his financial arrangements. These days, in fact, they often don't even talk to him personally. According to Kagan, reporters often just use the ready-made quotes he sends out in bulk emails on days when there is breaking news.

Pundits-for-hire are all the rage these days. The Bush administration pays conservative shills like Armstrong Williams to pimp administration policies in their newspaper columns. The Dean campaign did the same with bloggers. The pharmaceutical industry employs physicians as " key opinion leaders." Film studios ply pseudo-critics (so-called " quote whores") with gifts in exchange for favorable blurbs and reviews. Yet most pundits on the PR circuit actually need to write to get their money. Who knew that you could draw a paycheck for emitting a single sentence?

Bioethicists could take a lesson from Jeff Kagan. If you really want one of those plum consulting jobs with Pfizer, Lilly, or Dupont, forget about scholarship. Get yourself a television earpiece and some pancake make-up. Put together some pre-packaged remarks and start sending them out to reporters. Find a good speaker's bureau and start giving lectures at industry events. If you're lucky, you'll soon be a quote-a-matic yourself, and your phone will be ringing off the hook.

Comment on this essay.

Comments are sent to the forum moderator. Select responses may be posted.

On The Web

The Luxurious Growth
David Brooks, NY Times
“There seems to be a general feeling, as a Hastings Center working group put it, that ‘behavioral genetics will never explain as much of human behavior as was once promised.’”

Mind-Altering Drugs and the Problem Child
Claudia Meininger Gold, Boston Globe
“If we can listen differently to parents of young children who have ‘behavior problems,’ we can intervene early, before there is even a question of medication, and may be able to change these developing brains.”

Cash for Kidneys? Scheme Won't Work
Art Caplan, MSNBC
“A default donation plan could bring a boost in organs for transplant without creating the headaches, fears and misdistribution of a financial market.”

'Blade Runner' ruling subverts nature of sport
Art Caplan, MSNBC
“It may be fascinating to see who can go the fastest on rocket-powered legs or throw a heavy weight the farthest using performance-enhancing drugs, or genetically engineered muscles. But what you have then is an exhibition or a show, not a sport.”

A Phony 'War on Science'
Michael Gerson, Washington Post
“In their talk of a Republican war on science, liberals may be blinding themselves to a very different kind of modern war in which their own ideals are deeply implicated: a war on equality.”

It’s Not Immoral to Want to be Immortal
Arthur Caplan, MSNBC
“Despite a lot of hand-wringing and finger-pointing, it is not obvious that wanting to live a lot longer is evil or immoral.”

Science Is Leading Us to More Answers, but It's Also Misleading Us
David A. Shaywitz, Washington Post
“Consumers of scientific information must balance the hope we place in global biology with the skepticism this field has surely earned.”

Taking the Scary out of Breast Cancer Stats
Carol Tavris and Avrum Bluming, LA Times
“The media understand how deeply women fear breast cancer, and the result is that every study that seems to find a link between some new risk factor and the disease makes headlines everywhere.”

Dollars to Doughnuts Diagnosis
Albert Fuchs, LA Times
“Insurance doesn't make routine care affordable; it makes it more expensive by adding a middleman.”

Tainted Medicine
Jerome P. Kassirer, LA Times
“Disclosure of financial ties may give a scientist or researcher a clean conscience, but that doesn't erase the possibility of a conflict.”

Children's health can't be left to faith alone
Arthur Caplan, MSNBC
“Parents do not have the right to watch a child wither away while they pray.”

Transplant List Numbers Raise Doubts
Arthur Caplan, MSNBC
“The American people have a right to expect absolute honesty about the number of people waiting for a transplant at any time.”

An Epidemic No One Wants to Talk About
Robert E. Fullilove et al., Washington Post
“Simply put, we will never rid the United States of HIV and other STDs if our only weapon is medical treatment.”

Making Cells Like Computers
Erik Parens, Boston Globe
“Conceivably, we are on the verge of installing synthetic genomes in bacterial cells to create products we want. But we are still a long, long way from doing what most people mean by ‘synthesizing life.’”

Miracle Workers?
David Rieff, New York Times Magazine
“Even today, the oldest of all relations between patient and physician — that of supplicant to shaman — continues to exert its authority.”

Overselling Overmedication
Judith Warner, NYTimes.com
“Most of the critics decrying the over-medicalization of the American mind rest their arguments upon the bedrock assumption that people who have nothing wrong with them are being medicated for largely fictitious concerns.”

Ads Spur Urge for Drugs
David Lazarus, LA Times
“DTC advertising has turned prescription drugs into just another gotta-have-it consumer product.”

Contact Us | Privacy | Terms Of Use 

© The Hastings Center 2008